I’m not the same reviewer who covered Time Stall, but even so I agree with the ratings and they are consistent. Longevity, as Omar points out, is so much more than just how long the game takes to play to complete.

I would say an ‘average’ player will have to spend longer to complete End Space than you posit. But that’s not the whole story, and I explain the score in the review text.

Time Stall can be ‘finished’ in 90 minutes, but not ‘completed’, if you try to accomplish all the challenges, it’ll take more time. Time Stall also opens itself up for far more experimentation on its levels and is full of little Easter eggs, and if you enjoy the mechanics, you can try out all kinds of things. Here, it’s really just a matter of aim, shoot, done.

Sure you CAN rush through Time Stall if you want, but then you’re doing the game (and yourself) a great disservice. In all cases, thanks for taking the time to read out review, and don’t let a low score stop you from enjoying a game if it’s something you feel you’d like.

There’s also a ‘user rating’ that you can use that will allow other readers to see what the majority of our readers think of a game. Have a great day!

6 longevity for this game when it is 2 hours.

Both the same price so got to love the bias just because one game was liked and the other wasn’t.